SPRC Home > Best Practices Registry > Expert and Consensus Statements
Section II: Expert and Consensus Statements
This section of the BPR lists expert and consensus statements that summarize the best knowledge in suicide
prevention in the form of guidelines or protocols. These statements typically result from either a collaborative
process involving key stakeholders or from a thorough review of the literature by a preeminent expert in that
topic area.
Section II statements provide guidance and recommendations (including protocols) that
practitioners can use while developing programs, practices, or policies for their own settings. Note that
Section III also lists protocols; however, Section III protocols have been implemented in specific settings rather
than serving as general guidance for the field. Several of the criteria used to review Section III materials are
based on statements listed in Section II (i.e., the Safe and Effective Messaging Guidelines and the AAS Guidelines
for School-Based Prevention Programs).
Section II Review Process and Criteria
To be eligible for review, the expert/consensus statement must address
specific objectives
of the National Strategy for Suicide Prevention.
Each expert/consensus statement is rated by three suicide prevention experts on six criteria:
- Importance: The statement provides an important tool that, if used as intended, contributes to the field of suicide prevention.
- Likelihood of Meeting Objectives: If implemented as intended, the statement is likely to meet its objectives.
- Accuracy: Information contained in the statement is accurate.
- Safety: If implemented as intended, the statement is unlikely to result in a predictable increase in suicide risk or other adverse event.
- Congruence with Prevailing Knowledge: The statement accurately reflects prevailing knowledge in the field. If applicable, recommendations should be based upon an appropriate review of the literature.
- Appropriateness of Development Process: Appropriate and adequate methods were used to derive the statement's recommendations. If applicable, this included the use of a consensus building process involving appropriate stakeholders.
Each of the six criteria listed above is rated on a scale of 1 (low) through 4 (high).
Statements must receive an average score of 3 or greater on each item to be included in the BPR.
To Apply to Section II
If you know of expert or consensus statements that may be appropriate for inclusion in this category, please
contact Philip Rodgers to discuss submission procedures.
Section II Expert and Consensus Statements
(Listed alphabetically by title)
Please check back frequently for new listings!
- A Resource Guide for Implementing the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) 2007 Patient Safety Goals on Suicide (PDF)
- Consensus Statement on Youth Suicide by Firearms, Youth Suicide by Firearms Task Force and the American Association of Suicidology (PDF coming soon)
- Framework for Developing Institutional Protocols for the Acutely Distressed or Suicidal College Student, Jed Foundation (PDF)
- Guidelines for School Based Suicide Prevention Programs, American Association of Suicidology (PDF Coming Soon)
- National Guidelines for Seniors' Mental Health, Canadian Coalition for Seniors' Mental Health (PDF)
- Reporting on Suicide: Recommendations for the Media, Multiple Authors (PDF)
- Warning Signs for Suicide, American Association of Suicidology (PDF)